Create your own social network with a free forum.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to NFL Draft Blitz. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:




Pages: (3) 1 2 [3]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Super Bowl: Steelers vs. Seahawks, Make mine an XL
Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
yisman
Posted: Feb 7 2006, 12:08 AM


Unbreakable


Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 2,890
Member No.: 2
Joined: 3-July 05
QUOTE (Soup Nazi @ Feb 6 2006, 11:05 PM)
in all honesty i think randle el should be back up qb as well as wr. he can through the ball better than charlie batch. id like to see randleel as a qb for one game.

I was saying that earlier in the season when they kept playing Maddox in Roethlisberger's stead. Maddox was so horrible, that putting in Randle El could hardly hurt.


--------------------

QUOTE (Dr. Z)
Mike Patrick, Joe Theismann and Paul Maguire, ESPN -- How is it earthly possible to drop from half a star to none? Easy. They used to provide a teeny weeny bit of information. Now they provide none. And they contradict themselves, often from one series to the next. I don't think they're really fully aware of what they're saying.
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Game Discussion Board | Next Newest »
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.6233 seconds | Archive